Klau-Med, Inc. v. Bodyworks Medical, Inc.
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the CourtArmstrong, J.
Plaintiff appeals from a judgment dismissing its action as a sanction for discovery violations. Because we conclude that the court failed to consider less onerous sanctions for the violations and to explain why those lesser sanctions were inadequate, we reverse.
Plaintiff brought this action for breach of contract and intentional interference with business relations in February 1996. On March 28, 1996, defendants served plaintiff with a request for production of documents in the action. On May 16, 1996, plaintiff served a response to that request, objecting to certain requests and agreeing to…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Pamplin v. VictoriaOregon Supreme Court · 1994
- Pamplin v. VictoriaCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1996
- Stasch v. '69 Investment, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1997
3Cited by5 opinions
- SAIF Corp. v. HarrisCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1999
- Belinskey v. ClootenCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2007
- Johnson v. Eugene Emergency Physicians, P.C.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1999
- Warren v. Cieri Management Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2025
- Asato v. DunnCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2006