Legal Opinion

Pamplin v. Victoria

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided January 24, 1996No. 16-91-06925; CA A87167PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRiggs, P. J.

Plaintiffs appeal from the trial court’s dismissal of their personal injury action against defendant arising out of an automobile accident that they allege resulted from defendant’s negligence. The trial court dismissed the case as a sanction for plaintiffs’ counsel’s belated compliance with a discovery order, in violation of ORCP 46 B. The Supreme Court reversed the dismissal and remanded for “further proceedings’ ’ on the ground that the trial court had not made the requisite findings to impose the sanction of dismissal, reasoning that findings were necessary to enable meaningful review by…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Pamplin v. VictoriaOregon Supreme Court · 1994
  2. Shaver Forwarding Co. v. Eagle Star InsuranceOregon Supreme Court · 1945
  3. Hahm v. HillsCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1984
  4. Baker v. Lane CountyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1978
  5. City of Idanha v. Consumers Power, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1973

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Lambert v. American Dream Homes Corp.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1997
  2. Chang v. ChunCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2020
  3. Qui Phu Phan v. MorrowCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2003
  4. Asbill v. AngelozziCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2015
  5. State v. Guzman-VeraCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2020

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API