Legal Opinion

SAIF Corp. v. Harris

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided June 2, 1999No. 95C-12509; CA A98928PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtEdmonds, J.

Defendant appeals from the trial court’s denial of a motion to set aside a judgment by default, ORCP 71, and a subsequent denial of a motion to set aside both the order of default, ORCP 69 C, and the judgment. We affirm.

Plaintiff, SAIF Corporation, brought an action against defendant, the owner of a roofing company, for unpaid workers’ compensation premiums. Defendant had been audited by SAIF and had failed to make a timely administrative appeal from a final billing. On August 15, 1995, plaintiff brought this action seeking $22,518 for the alleged amount of unpaid premiums, $225,180 in…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Lindsey v. NormetSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. McEwen v. Ortho Pharmaceutical CorporationOregon Supreme Court · 1974
  3. Davis v. O'BRIENOregon Supreme Court · 1995
  4. Oberg v. Honda Motor Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1995
  5. Pamplin v. VictoriaOregon Supreme Court · 1994

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Budden v. DykstraCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2002
  2. Peeples v. LampertCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2006
  3. Becker v. PieperCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2001
  4. Hart v. HillCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2009
  5. Asato v. DunnCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2006

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API