Stasch v. '69 Investment, Inc.
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the CourtLandau, J.
This is an action for common-law fraud and statutory violations arising out of plaintiffs’ purchase of a parcel of real property. The trial court dismissed the action as a sanction for plaintiffs’ failure to appear for depositions. Defendants then moved for an award of attorney fees on the basis of a fee provision in the real estate sales agreement executed by the parties, but the trial court denied the motion on the ground that this is a tort action, and thus, the contractual fee provision is inapplicable. On appeal, plaintiffs contend that the trial court failed to make findings that are…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Pamplin v. VictoriaOregon Supreme Court · 1994
- Pamplin v. VictoriaCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1996
3Cited by3 opinions
- SAIF Corp. v. HarrisCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1999
- Klau-Med, Inc. v. Bodyworks Medical, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1998
- Johnson v. Eugene Emergency Physicians, P.C.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1999