Legal Opinion
Novak v. MacKintosh
District Court, D. South Dakota
Decided January 30, 1996No. CIV 95-4051PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
PIERSOL, District Judge.
Defendants move for summary judgment on the complaint brought pursuant to the Veterans’ Reemployment Rights Act, 38 U.S.C. §§ 2021-27. 1 Doc. 36. Defendants allege that Plaintiffs dismissal was unrelated to her military duties and that her failure to return to work or apply for reinstatement after her dismissal jurisdictionally bars her suit. Doe. 37 at 3-4. Defendants request, in the alternative, that Defendant Donald P. Mackintosh be dismissed as an improper party. Doe. 37 at 6. Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment is denied for the following reasons.
FACTS
Plai…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Price Waterhouse v. HopkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Busby v. City of OrlandoCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1991
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Satterfield v. Borough of Schuylkill HavenDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1998
- Fink v. City of New YorkDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2001
- Risner v. Ohio Department of Rehabilitation & CorrectionDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 2008
- Kelley v. Maine Eye Care Associates, P.A.District Court, D. Maine · 1999
- Mace v. WillisDistrict Court, D. South Dakota · 2017
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.