Risner v. Ohio Department of Rehabilitation & Correction
District Court, N.D. Ohio
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION AND GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR JUDGMENT ON THE PLEADINGS
LESLEY WELLS, District Judge.
Plaintiff John L. Risner brought this action against the Ohio Department of Rehabilitation and Correction’s (“ODRC”), Sharon Haines, Jill Goldhart, and Harry Hageman, alleging discrimination in violation of the Uniform Services Employment and Re-Employment Rights Act (“USER-RA”), 38 U.S.C. § 4301, et seq. (Doc. 1). The matter was referred to Magistrate Judge Kenneth S. McHargh on 31 March 2008 (Doc. 23), pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §…
2Cases cited36 opinions
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Thomas v. ArnSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Will v. Michigan Department of State PoliceSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Kokkonen v. Guardian Life Insurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Ex Parte YoungSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Kassel v. City of MiddletownDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2017
- Croft v. Village of NewarkDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 2014
- Bello v. Village of SkokieDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2015
- Clark v. Va. Dep't of State PoliceSupreme Court of Virginia · 2016
- Lisdahl v. Mayo Foundation for Medical Education & ResearchDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 2010
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.