Legal Opinion
Mace v. Willis
District Court, D. South Dakota
Decided April 21, 2017No. 4:16-CV-04150-VLDPublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
VERONICA L. DUFFY, United States Magistrate Judge
INTRODUCTION
Plaintiff Kieshia Mace brings suit against Corey Willis; Kickbox Dakota, LLC; and David Borchardt. Ms. Mace asks for damages for violation of the Uniformed Services Employment and Reemployment Rights Act (“USERRA”), 38 U.S.C. §§ 4301-4335.1
FINDINGS OF FACT
The following facts have been established by the greater weight of the evidence. Kieshia Mace first was employed by defendant Kickbox Dakota, LLC (“Kick-box”), on April 25, 2016. See Exhibit 6 at p. 1. Kickbox is a 9Rounds franchise owned by defendant Corey Willis…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Trans World Airlines, Inc. v. ThurstonSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Cheryl P. Francis v. Booz, Allen & Hamilton, Incorporated, Reserve Officers Association, Amicus SupportingCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2006
- Sheehan v. Department of the NavyCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2001
- Clegg v. Arkansas Department of CorrectionCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2007
- Serricchio v. WACHOVIA SECURITIES LLCCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2011
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Tolle v. PocketSonics, Inc.District Court, W.D. Virginia · 2018
- Tammy Webster v. Mississippi Wildlife, Fisheries, and ParksMississippi Supreme Court · 2018
- Babineaux v. Southeastern Baptist CollegeDistrict Court, S.D. Mississippi · 2025
- Bailey v. Forrest County, MississippiDistrict Court, S.D. Mississippi · 2021
- Grant Stitsworth v. Forest River, Inc.District Court, N.D. Indiana · 2025
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.