Legal Opinion
Satterfield v. Borough of Schuylkill Haven
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Decided July 7, 1998No. 2:96-cv-05916PublishedCited by 42 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
VAN ANTWERPEN, District Judge.
I. INTRODUCTION
The Plaintiff is an active member of the United States Army Reserves and the former Borough Manager of Schuylkill Haven. Defendant Borough of Schuylkill Haven (the “Borough”) is a duly organized municipality under the laws of Pennsylvania. Defendant Borough Council of Schuylkill Haven (the “Borough Council”) is a duly elected body existing under the laws of Pennsylvania. The remaining Defendants are members of the Borough Council.
The Plaintiff has asserted eleven causes of actions against the Defendants. These causes of action…
2Cases cited57 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Board of Regents of State Colleges v. RothSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Kentucky v. GrahamSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
52 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by42 opinions
- Keith A. Hill v. Borough of Kutztown and Gennaro Marino, Mayor of Kutztown, in His Individual and Official CapacityCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2006
- Walden v. Saint Gobain Corp.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2004
- Rosembert v. Borough of East LansdowneDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2014
- Kelly Laverdure v. County of Montgomery Michael D. MarinoCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2003
- Fink v. City of New YorkDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2001
37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.