Legal Opinion

Granberry v. Islay Investments

California Court of Appeal

Decided October 30, 1984No. Civ. 68686PublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

GILBERT, J.

—Here we attempt to make sense out of Civil Code section 1950.5.

Defendant Islay Investments (Islay) is a partnership that owns and rents apartments. Codefendant Marvin Trevillian is Islay’s managing partner. Plaintiffs are tenants of Islay, who have been certified as a class under Code of Civil Procedure section 382. They contend that Islay’s rental practices violate Civil Code section 1950.5, 2 and appeal from a partial summary judgment entered in favor of Islay.

We hold that the trial court erred in granting summary judgment to Islay because the court misinterpreted the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Freedland v. GrecoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955
  2. Alford v. PiernoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1972
  3. Hepp v. Lockheed-California Co.California Court of Appeal · 1978
  4. Bauman v. Islay InvestmentsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1973
  5. Golden v. City of OaklandCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1975

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. California Teachers Ass'n v. Governing Board of Rialto Unified School DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1997
  2. Granberry v. Islay InvestmentsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995
  3. Dills v. Redwoods Associates, Ltd.California Court of Appeal · 1994
  4. Schraer v. Berkeley Property Owners' Ass'nCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1989
  5. Looney v. SUPERIOR COURT OF LOS ANGELES CTY.California Court of Appeal · 1993

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API