Legal Opinion
Alford v. Pierno
California Court of Appeal
Decided September 12, 1972No. Civ. 30439PublishedCited by 86 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
BRAY, J. *
Plaintiffs and appellants appeal from an order and judgment denying their petition for writ of mandamus.
Questions Presented
1. May a curative permit, pursuant to Corporations Code section 25802, be issued to a corporation in process of dissolution?
2. Did respondents’ findings support the judgment?
3. Did granting of the curative permit work a fraud on appellants?
4. Did the trial court err in denying findings of fact and conclusions of law?
Record
On August 10, 1970 plaintiffs filed in Alameda County Superior Court a petition for writ of mandamus ordering defendant Commissioner of…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Select Base Materials, Inc. v. Board of EqualizationCalifornia Supreme Court · 1959
- Bixby v. PiernoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
- Johnston v. Security InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1970
- Gong v. City of FremontCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1967
- City of Lewiston v. MathewsonIdaho Supreme Court · 1956
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by86 opinions
- Dyna-Med, Inc. v. Fair Employment & Housing CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1987
- In Re Marriage of BouquetCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
- California Manufacturers Ass'n v. Public Utilities CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1979
- DeYoung v. City of San DiegoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1983
- Cossack v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
81 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.