Legal Opinion

Dills v. Redwoods Associates, Ltd.

California Court of Appeal

Decided September 28, 1994No. C016304PublishedCited by 47 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

DAVIS, J.

At issue in this case is whether a mobilehome park owner may charge resident mobilehome owners for the cost of capital improvements as a variable-expense item supplemental to a fixed base rent. We hold that nothing in Civil Code section 798.31 (undesignated section references will be to this code) precludes this practice, capital expenses being a traditional component of rent and there being nothing in the statutory language expressing a concern with the way rent itself is structured. Consequently, we shall affirm the judgment of dismissal entered after the trial court…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Knickerbocker v. City of StocktonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1988
  2. Gregory v. City of San Juan CapistranoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1983
  3. Granberry v. Islay InvestmentsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1984
  4. Cal-American Income Property Fund IV v. HoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1984
  5. Karrin v. Ocean-Aire Mobile Home EstatesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1991

3Cited by47 opinions

  1. In Re Marriage of Falcone & FykeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2008
  2. Guthrey v. State of CaliforniaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1998
  3. Keyes v. BowenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2010
  4. City of Santa Maria v. AdamCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2012
  5. Nealy v. City of Santa MonicaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2015

42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API