Dills v. Redwoods Associates, Ltd.
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
DAVIS, J.
At issue in this case is whether a mobilehome park owner may charge resident mobilehome owners for the cost of capital improvements as a variable-expense item supplemental to a fixed base rent. We hold that nothing in Civil Code section 798.31 (undesignated section references will be to this code) precludes this practice, capital expenses being a traditional component of rent and there being nothing in the statutory language expressing a concern with the way rent itself is structured. Consequently, we shall affirm the judgment of dismissal entered after the trial court…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Knickerbocker v. City of StocktonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1988
- Gregory v. City of San Juan CapistranoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1983
- Granberry v. Islay InvestmentsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1984
- Cal-American Income Property Fund IV v. HoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1984
- Karrin v. Ocean-Aire Mobile Home EstatesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1991
3Cited by47 opinions
- In Re Marriage of Falcone & FykeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2008
- Guthrey v. State of CaliforniaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1998
- Keyes v. BowenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2010
- City of Santa Maria v. AdamCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2012
- Nealy v. City of Santa MonicaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2015
42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.