Legal Opinion
Bauman v. Islay Investments
California Court of Appeal
Decided February 22, 1973No. Civ. 40429PublishedCited by 21 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
KINGSLEY, J.
This is a class action 1 on behalf of the past and present tenants in defendants’ apartment buildings, to determine their rights in so-called “cleaning fees” collected by defendants on and after January 1, 1971, and not returned to the tenants. 2 Defendants’ demurrer was sustained without leave to amend; plaintiff has appealed; we reverse.
The complaint alleges that all tenants in defendants’ apartment building “on and after January 1, 1971,” entered into a uniform written form of rental agreement which required them to pay, prior to occupancy, a sum of money as a “cleaning…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Vasquez v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
- Friends of Mammoth v. Board of SupervisorsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1972
- Hagar v. Elite InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1971
3Cited by21 opinions
- Hittle v. Santa Barbara County Employees Retirement Ass'nCalifornia Supreme Court · 1985
- Julian v. Glenair, Inc., California Court of Appeal, 5th District2017
- Granberry v. Islay InvestmentsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1984
- B. W. v. Board of Medical Quality AssuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1985
- Tillie Lewis Foods, Inc. v. City of PittsburgCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1975
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.