Smith-Golden, Inc. v. Superior Court
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtMcCOMB, J.
These are original applications for writs of mandate requiring respondent superior court to vacate orders for the issuance of subpoenas duces tecum and to grant motions to quash the same. The above-entitled petitions were consolidated on stipulation in this court, since the facts and issues are the same, for the purpose of hearing, argument, briefs, and decision.
These are the essential facts:
The Institute of Automobile Dealers, Inc., filed actions against each of petitioners, seeking to enjoin them from violating a provision of the “Unfair Practices Act”. (Stats. 1913, p. 508, as amended;…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Ex Parte ClarkeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
- Kullman, Salz Co. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1911
- Funkenstein v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1914
- Shell Oil Co. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1930
- Morrison v. SturgesThe Superior Court of New York City · 1863
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Proctor & Gamble Manufacturing Co. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954
- Lewis v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1953
- Pacific Solvents Co. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1948