Legal Opinion
Lewis v. Superior Court
California Court of Appeal
Decided June 29, 1953No. Civ. 19705PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SCOTT (Robert H.), J. pro tem.
Petitioners apply for a writ of mandate requiring respondent superior court to quash a subpoena duces tecum issued by it and to vacate the order enforcing the same.
An action was commenced by George C. Knapp, as business representative, and Waunita Long, as secretary of United Shoe Workers of America, Local 122, C.I.O., as plaintiffs. They appear in these proceedings as the real parties in interest. Among other defendants are petitioners Lewis and Levitan individually and as copartners trading as California Footwear Company. The complaint is described as one for…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Lockheed Aircraft Corp. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
- McClatchy Newspapers v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1945
- Union Trust Co. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1938
- MacLay Rancho Realty Co. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1927
- Smith-Golden, Inc. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1940
3Cited by4 opinions
- Proctor & Gamble Manufacturing Co. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954
- Davis v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1992
- Pelton Motors, Inc. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1953
- Davis v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1992