Legal Opinion

Shell Oil Co. v. Superior Court

California Court of Appeal

Decided October 17, 1930No. Docket No. 7477PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SCHMIDT, J., pro tem.

In an action pending in the Superior Court of the State of California, in and for the County of Los Angeles, Josephine Cook, as plaintiff by her second amended complaint against Shell Oil Company, alleged that she was the owner of certain fractional royalty units under a certain oil and gas lease known as the ShellCoseboom-Dabney Lease, a copy of which was attached to the complaint; that there were certain breaches of covenants, express and implied, under said lease by the Shell Oil-Company, petitioner herein, and by which action she claimed damages in a large amount.…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Ex Parte ClarkeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
  2. Commercial Bank of Spanish America, Ltd. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1923
  3. Kullman, Salz Co. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1911
  4. Funkenstein v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1914
  5. Pyper v. JenningsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1920

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Dowell v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
  2. Union Trust Co. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1938
  3. Proctor & Gamble Manufacturing Co. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954
  4. Flora Crane Service, Inc. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1965
  5. Strauss v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1950

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API