Ex Parte Clarke
California Supreme Court
PETITION for a writ of habeas corpus in thg Supreme -Court to release the petitioner from imprisonment for contempt hyorder of the Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco. James M. Troutt, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtMcFARLAND, J.
—The petition herein sets forth that while a certain cause entitled Charles Erickson, doing business under the name of Charles Erickson & Co., plaintiff, v. Stockton & Tuolumne County Railroad Company, a corporation, defendant, was on trial in the superior court, the petitioner herein was called as a witness for the plaintiff in said cause and testified that he was the secretary of the defendant therein, and had charge of said defendant’s books; that the issues in said cause were those presented by the" pleadings therein which are attached to and made a part of the petition; that petitioner,…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Ex parte BrownCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
- Ex parte ZeehandelaarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1886
- Ex Parte RoweCalifornia Supreme Court · 1857
- La Farge v. La Farge Fire InsuranceThe Superior Court of New York City · 1857
- Morrison v. SturgesThe Superior Court of New York City · 1863
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by47 opinions
- Holm v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1954
- People v. GlazeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1903
- In Re BattelleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1929
- Commercial Bank of Spanish America, Ltd. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1923
- Kreling v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.