Funkenstein v. Superior Court
California Court of Appeal
APPLICATION for Writ of Prohibition to be directed to the Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the Court
THE COURT.
The case of Arturo Wolf and Marie Julia Wolf versus Charles Funkenstein Gall, Rebecca Funkengtein Gall, Edward Funkenstein, and Sarah Funkenstein, pending in the superior court of the city and county of San Francisco, state of California, is in form an action to quiet title to certain interests in real property in said city, of which it is averred in the complaint that one Tobe Funkenstein died seized on June 28,1913, leaving the parties to said action as her heirs at law, and as such entitled In their respective undivided interests in said property. The defendants deny that the…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Ex Parte ClarkeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
- Kullman, Salz Co. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1911
3Cited by17 opinions
- Demaree v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1937
- Wallace Bank & Trust Co. v. First National Bank of FairfieldIdaho Supreme Court · 1925
- Shell Oil Co. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1930
- State Ex Rel. Pitcher v. District CourtMontana Supreme Court · 1943
- Irving v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1926
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.