Midkiff v. North Carolina Granite Corp.
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtDeNNY, J.
The sole question for decision is whether an employee is entitled to compensation under the provisions of G.S. 97-61, which provides for compensation for an employee not actually disabled but found to be affected by silicosis, when such employee has not been exposed to inhalation of dust of silica or silicates for as much as two years in this State, within ten years prior to his last exposure.
This precise question has not been presented heretofore for our consideration and determination. And we know of no decision from any other jurisdiction where statutory provisions similar to those…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Young v. . Whitehall Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1948
- State v. . HumphriesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1936
- Mullen v. Town of LouisburgSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1945
- Trust Co. v. . Hood, Comr. of BanksSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1934
- Dyer v. . DyerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1937
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Sale v. JohnsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1963
- In Re MillerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1956
- Pitman v. L. M. Carpenter & AssociatesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1957
- Queen City Coach Co. v. CurrieSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1960
- Hicks v. North Carolina Granite Corp.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1956