Legal Opinion

Sale v. Johnson

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided February 27, 1963No. 385PublishedCited by 30 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtParker, J.

Defendant assigns as error the judgment on the pleadings entered upon plaintiffs’ motion.

The oomplaint .alleges, and the answer admits, the following: All procedural requirements of G.S. 105-267 have been met by plaintiffs to maintain this action for a refund of North Carolina sales tax paid by plaintiffs under protest to defendant State Commissioner of Revenue for the period 1 August 1958 to 1 July 1961. Plaintiffs, doing business under the name of W. E. Sale and Sons, own and operate a manufacturing business at Ronda in Wilkes County, which is principally engaged in the manufacture of…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Young v. . Whitehall Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1948
  2. Watson Industries, Inc. v. ShawSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1952
  3. Victory Cab Co. v. City of CharlotteSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1951
  4. City of Raleigh v. FisherSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1950
  5. Henderson v. . Gill, Comr. of RevenueSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1948

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. Black v. LittlejohnSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1985
  2. Johnson v. BollingerCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1987
  3. In Re WatsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1968
  4. Johnson v. BollingerCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1987
  5. Comptroller of the Treasury v. Fairchild Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1985

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API