Dyer v. . Dyer
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtWiNbobNE, J.
Conceding, but not deciding, that the judgment of absolute divorce upon ground of two years separation in his action is valid, is defendant thereafter subject to attachment for contempt for willful disobedience of order (C. S., 978 [4]) to pay his wife subsistence theretofore entered by his consent in her action therefor without divorce, under C. S., 1667 ? We hold that he is.
If the consent order in favor of the wife in her action is not subject to nullification by a decree of absolute divorce on ground of separation, then it remains as an order of the court with which the defendant must,…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- State v. . WoolardSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1896
- Trust Co. v. . Hood, Comr. of BanksSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1934
- Cram v. . CramSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1895
- Anderson v. AndersonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1922
- Ellis v. . EllisSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1927
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by28 opinions
- Bunn v. BunnSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1964
- Perry v. StancilSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1953
- Kalchthaler v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1946
- Byers v. . ByersSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1943
- Mullen v. Town of LouisburgSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1945
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.