Legal Opinion

Young v. . Whitehall Co.

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided October 20, 1948PublishedCited by 134 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtEkviN, J.

As originally adopted in 1929, the North Carolina Workmen’s Compensation Act provided merely for compensation for the death or disability of a workman resulting from injury by accident arising out of and in the course of his employment. G. S., 97-2. In 1935, an amendment broadened the scope of the Act by making compensable twenty-five designated occupational diseases, including asbestosis and silicosis. G. S., 97-53.

In thus extending the coverage of the statute, the Legislature expressly decreed that disablement or death of a workman from a designated occupational disease “shall be treated as…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Everson v. General Accident, Fire & Life Assurance Corp.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1909
  2. Joliff v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1908
  3. State v. . EarnhardtSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1915
  4. Dorrell v. Norida Land & Timber Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1933
  5. Alexander v. . JohnstonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1916

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by134 opinions

  1. Burgess v. Your House of Raleigh, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1990
  2. Hansel v. Sherman TextilesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1981
  3. Anderson v. Northwestern Motor Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1951
  4. Honeycutt v. Carolina Asbestos Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1952
  5. State v. SpencerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1970

129 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API