Legal Opinion
Demar v. Open Space & Conservation Commission
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided June 6, 1989No. 13578PublishedCited by 60 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtArthur H. Healey, J.
On or about April 29,1987, the plaintiffs, Donald Demar and Dwelling Development Corporation, applied to the defendant, the open space and conservation commission of the town of Rocky Hill (the commission), for a permit to reconstruct a drainage outlet affecting a subdivision owned by Demar. The commission is a duly authorized and constituted board or agency of Rocky Hill and acts as that town’s inland wetlands and watercourse agency pursuant to General Statutes §§ 22a-36 through 22a-45 and Rocky Hill ordinance No. 36-72, adopted in 1972.
The proposed subdivision was to be located on a 19.92…
2Cases cited38 opinions
- Phelps Dodge Corp. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Griffiths v. CommissionerSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
- Riggs v. Johnson CountySupreme Court of the United States · 1868
- Sturman v. SochaSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1983
- Monroe v. MonroeSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1979
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by60 opinions
- In re Baby Girl B.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1992
- LeConche v. ElligersSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1990
- Lauer v. Zoning CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1991
- Bank of Boston Connecticut v. SchlesingerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1991
- McCutcheon & Burr, Inc. v. BermanSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1991
55 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.