Murach v. Planning & Zoning Commission
Supreme Court of Connecticut
1Opinion of the CourtArthur H. Healey, J.
This case is an appeal from a judgment of the trial court upholding a decision of the city of New London planning and zoning commission (hereinafter the commission) to approve a zone reclassification. The questions presented require us to construe portions of General Statutes § 8-191 as applied to General Statutes § 8-4a.2
The trial court found the following facts. On June 1, 1982, the defendants William E. Maloney and Ectrav, Inc., applied to the commission for a zoning reclassification of a tract of land consisting of approximately five acres located north of interstate route 95 and east of…
2Cases cited52 opinions
- Pandolphe's Auto Parts, Inc. v. Town of ManchesterSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1980
- State v. CarrollSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1871
- Peck v. JacqueminSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1985
- Robinson v. Unemployment Security Board of ReviewSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1980
- Spring v. ConstantinoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1975
47 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by72 opinions
- Simko v. Zoning Board of AppealsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1988
- Mahoney v. LensinkSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1990
- Frito-Lay, Inc. v. Planning & Zoning CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1988
- Jutkowitz v. Department of Health ServicesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1991
- Kinney v. StateSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1989
67 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.