Legal Opinion

Rogers v. Joplin & Pittsburg Railway Co.

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided April 5, 1924No. 25,180PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Dawson, J.:

Plaintiff sought to maintain this action under the Workmen’s Compensation Act. At the conclusion of' plaintiff’s opening statement, defendant’s motion for judgment on the petition and opening statement was sustained.

Plaintiff appeals.

*816The facts pleaded and stated on plaintiff’s behalf were these: Plaintiff was a conductor on defendant’s interurban railway. Both were working under the compensation act. On November 20, 1919, plaintiff stepped off his car to throw a switch in a street in Pitts-burg. While so engaged, one H. H. Hall, driving an…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Bevard v. Skidmore-Patterson Coal Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1917
  2. Raffaghelle v. RussellSupreme Court of Kansas · 1918
  3. Smith v. Solvay Process Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1917
  4. Whitby v. Armour & Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1923
  5. Jacobs v. Hamilton Coal & Mercantile Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1919

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Long v. WattsSupreme Court of Kansas · 1930
  2. Landauer v. State Industrial Accident CommissionOregon Supreme Court · 1944
  3. Chappell v. Morris & Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1925
  4. Mortimer v. Edgar Zinc Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1927
  5. Moore v. Dolese Brothers Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1951

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API