Legal Opinion

Smith v. Solvay Process Co.

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided March 10, 1917No. 20,414PublishedCited by 20 opinions

Appeal from Reno district court; Frank F. Prigg, judge.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Johnston, C. J.:

This was an action by Charles C. Smith against the Solvay Process Company to recover compensation for an injury to his eye. A demurrer to his petition was sustained and he appeals.

*41It was alleged that the defendant was operating under the provisions of the workmen’s compensation act; that the injury was caused by a small piece of steel or rust penetrating his eye, which was soon thereafter removed by a physician; that at the time of the accident he informed the foreman of the defendant of his injury and the latter looked at the injured…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Gailey v. Peet Bros. Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1916
  2. Knoll v. City of SalinaSupreme Court of Kansas · 1916

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Bates & Rogers Construction Co. v. AllenCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1919
  2. Pine v. State Industrial Com.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1931
  3. Oklahoma Gas & Electric Co. v. ThomasSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1925
  4. Higgins v. Heine Boiler Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1931
  5. Griffin v. Rustless Iron & Steel Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1947

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API