Smith v. Solvay Process Co.
Supreme Court of Kansas
Appeal from Reno district court; Frank F. Prigg, judge.
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Johnston, C. J.:
This was an action by Charles C. Smith against the Solvay Process Company to recover compensation for an injury to his eye. A demurrer to his petition was sustained and he appeals.
*41It was alleged that the defendant was operating under the provisions of the workmen’s compensation act; that the injury was caused by a small piece of steel or rust penetrating his eye, which was soon thereafter removed by a physician; that at the time of the accident he informed the foreman of the defendant of his injury and the latter looked at the injured…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Gailey v. Peet Bros. Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1916
- Knoll v. City of SalinaSupreme Court of Kansas · 1916
3Cited by20 opinions
- Bates & Rogers Construction Co. v. AllenCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1919
- Pine v. State Industrial Com.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1931
- Oklahoma Gas & Electric Co. v. ThomasSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1925
- Higgins v. Heine Boiler Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1931
- Griffin v. Rustless Iron & Steel Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1947
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.