Mortimer v. Edgar Zinc Co.
Supreme Court of Kansas
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Marshall, J.:
The defendant appeals from an order overruling its demurrer to the petition of the plaintiff in an action to recover under the workmen’s compensation law.
The defendant argues that the petition is defective in a number of particulars, as follows: That “there is no allegation in the amended petition that the pjaintiff had been prevented from earning wages or compensation in any definite or fixed amount”; that “there is no allegation in the amended petition that compensation has become due and payable in any amount”; that “the plaintiff . . .…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Gailey v. Peet Bros. Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1916
- Smith v. Solvay Process Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1917
- Knoll v. City of SalinaSupreme Court of Kansas · 1916
- Whitby v. Armour & Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1923
- Chappell v. Morris & Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1925
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Higginbotham v. Oklahoma Portland Cement Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1932