Legal Opinion

Jacobs v. Hamilton Coal & Mercantile Co.

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided July 5, 1919No. 22,083PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Appeal from Crawford district court; Andrew J. Curran, judge.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Dawson, J.:

The plaintiff brought two actions for compensation for injuries alleged to have been sustained in defendant’s coal mine.

The first action was for an injury to plaintiff’s leg, alleged to have been sustained on October 11, 1916; the second action, in two counts, was for an alleged injury to his eye, which occurred on June 1, 1917, and for injuries to his back and shoulder, which occurred on August 17, 1917. The actions were consolidated in the district court. A jury was waived, and the plaintiff was nonsuited on his claims for compensation for…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Bruington v. WagonerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1917
  2. Bruington v. WagonerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1917
  3. Wideman v. FaivreSupreme Court of Kansas · 1917
  4. Smith v. Solvay Process Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1917
  5. Ackerson v. National Zinc Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1915

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Murphy v. W. O. Cook Construction Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1930
  2. Whitby v. Armour & Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1923
  3. Rogers v. Joplin & Pittsburg Railway Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1924
  4. Shmana v. Swift & Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1923

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API