Legal Opinion

Landauer v. State Industrial Accident Commission

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided October 2, 1944PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtKelly, J.

Upon this appeal two questions are presented. One is whether claimant’s statement of claim as originally filed with defendant State Industrial Accident Commission, hereinafter designated the commission, and her petition for rehearing are sufficient to justify us in holding that the commission abused its discretion in rejecting said claim because it had not been filed within three months after the accident which is alleged to have caused claimant’s injury, one year not having elapsed after the accident before the commission was called upon to decide whether to permit said claim to be…

2Cases cited133 opinions

  1. Dushane v. BenedictSupreme Court of the United States · 1887
  2. Williams v. Safety Casualty Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1937
  3. Associated Indemnity Corp. v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1932
  4. Marsh v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1933
  5. Guderian v. Sterling Sugar & Ry. Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1922

128 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Brown v. SAIF Corp.Oregon Supreme Court · 2017
  2. Keller v. City of AlbuquerqueNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1973
  3. Wilder v. HaworthOregon Supreme Court · 1950
  4. Griffin v. Rustless Iron & Steel Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1947
  5. Tice v. State Industrial Accident CommissionOregon Supreme Court · 1947

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API