Legal Opinion

D & W, INC. v. City of Charlotte

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided December 19, 1966No. 286PublishedCited by 39 opinions

1Per curiam

Judge Riddle’s order decided a purely legal question and restrained defendants, “until further order of the court,” from conducting themselves except in accordance with the law as announced therein. It was, in its effect and scope, a final judgment granting for an indefinite period the only relief sought by plaintiffs, i. e., injunction. Our opinion, in addition to holding that the remedy of injunction was not available to plaintiff, declared the law of this State with respect to the purchase, transportation, possession, and use of alcoholic beverages as defined by G.S. 18-60, reversed the…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Ex Parte Sibbald v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1838
  2. Cowdery v. London Etc. BankCalifornia Supreme Court · 1903
  3. Collins v. SimmsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1962
  4. Smith v. GarbeNebraska Supreme Court · 1910
  5. Raht v. Southern Railway Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1965

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by39 opinions

  1. Epps v. Duke University, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1996
  2. State ex rel. Commissioner of Insurance v. North Carolina Automobile Rate Administrative OfficeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1978
  3. In re Annexation Ordinance Adopted by the City of New BernSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1971
  4. Couch v. Private Diagnostic ClinicCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2001
  5. Crump v. Independence NissanCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1993

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API