State ex rel. Commissioner of Insurance v. North Carolina Automobile Rate Administrative Office
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
EXUM, Justice.
The most important question raised, and one which is determinative of the appeal, is whether the Commissioner exceeded his statutory authority by abolishing the primary use classifications and safe driver subclassifications for motorcycle liability insurance. The Court of Appeals concluded that he did, and we agree. We therefore vacate the order entered by him.
A full factual statement outlining the proceedings leading to the Commissioner’s order is set out accurately in the opinion of the Court of Appeals. We will not repeat it here. Briefly these *62proceedings were precipitated…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Utilities Commission v. EdmistenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1977
- Stevenson v. City of DurhamSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1972
- State v. SpencerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1970
- State Ex Rel. North Carolina Milk Commission v. National Food Stores, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1967
- In Re a Filing Made by the North Carolina Fire Insurance Rating BureauSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1969
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by77 opinions
- Rhyne v. K-Mart Corp.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 2004
- State v. ScottSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2002
- Sutton v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1989
- Teachy v. Coble Dairies, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1982
- Schofield v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1980
72 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.