Legal Opinion
Crump v. Independence Nissan
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
Decided November 16, 1993No. 9210IC982PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ARNOLD, Chief Judge.
Plaintiff first assigns error to the full Commission’s adoption of the deputy commissioner’s opinion and award. Plaintiff argues that it is not sufficient for the full Commission to merely adopt the deputy commissioner’s opinion and award and that if the record is not adequate to determine whether or not the deputy commissioner was mistaken in law and fact, then the case should be remanded for further fact finding by the Commission. We disagree.
N.C. Gen. Stat. § 97-85 provides for the review of an award by the full Commission:
If application is made to the Commission within…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Joyner v. Rocky Mount MillsCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1988
- D & W, INC. v. City of CharlotteSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1966
- Vieregge v. N.C. State UniversityCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1992
- Lynch v. M. B. Kahn Construction Co.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1979
- Brookover v. Borden, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1990
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Lewis v. Craven Regional Medical CenterCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1996
- Matthews v. Charlotte-Mecklenburg Hospital AuthorityCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1999
- Pulley v. City of DurhamCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1996
- Starr v. Gaston County Board of EducationCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2008
- Gilbert v. Entenmann's, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1994
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.