Legal Opinion

Palmieri v. Mobil Oil Corp.

District Court, D. Connecticut

Decided January 8, 1982No. Civ. H-81-898, H-81-928PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

RULING ON PLAINTIFFS’ MOTIONS FOR A PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION

CLARIE, Chief Judge.

The plaintiffs Joseph Palmieri and Anthony Morin seek to enjoin the defendant Mobil Oil Corporation (“Mobil”) from terminating their respective franchise agreements until such time as their claims for permanent relief have been adjudicated. In this consolidated action, they claim that the Petroleum Marketing Practices Act 1 (“PMPA”), as enacted by Congress, imposes a legal duty on petroleum franchisors like Mobil to act in a reasonable, nonarbitrary manner when dealing with their franchisees and that Mobil has…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Chapman v. Houston Welfare Rights OrganizationSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. Munno v. Amoco Oil Co.District Court, D. Connecticut · 1980
  3. Bellmore v. Mobil Oil Corp.District Court, D. Connecticut · 1981

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Esso Standard Oil Company v. Department of Consumer AffairsCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1986
  2. Don Roberts v. Amoco Oil CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1984
  3. Meyer v. Amerada Hess Corp.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1982
  4. Cason v. Texaco, Inc.District Court, M.D. Louisiana · 1985
  5. Joseph Palmieri v. Mobil Oil CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1982

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API