Legal Opinion
Bellmore v. Mobil Oil Corp.
District Court, D. Connecticut
Decided June 15, 1981No. Civ. B-81-172PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RULING ON PLAINTIFF’S APPLICATION FOR A PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION
DALY, District Judge.
This case is now before the Court on plaintiff Bellmore’s application for a preliminary injunction. 1 A temporary restraining order currently in effect maintains the status quo as it was on May 31, 1981, when Mr. Bellmore’s franchise agreement with Mobil was due to expire, but bars either party from construing on-going relations between them as a renewal or creation of a franchise agreement. Plaintiff claims that Mobil’s decision not to renew the contract was not the result of “determinations made by [Mobil] in…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Munno v. Amoco Oil Co.District Court, D. Connecticut · 1980
- Pearman v. Texaco, Inc.District Court, W.D. Missouri · 1979
- Ferriola v. Gulf Oil Corp.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1980
- Kesselman v. Gulf Oil Corp.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1979
- Daniels v. Dilmar Oil Co.District Court, D. South Carolina · 1980
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Harold J. Bellmore, Michael J. Fox, and James M. Montesanto, Harold J. Bellmore, Cross-Appellant v. Mobil Oil Corporation, Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1986
- Esso Standard Oil Company v. Department of Consumer AffairsCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1986
- Ackley v. Gulf Oil Corp.District Court, D. Connecticut · 1989
- Meyer v. Amerada Hess Corp.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1982
- Gruber v. Mobil Oil Corp.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 1983
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.