Chapman v. Houston Welfare Rights Organization
Supreme Court of the United States
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Stevens
The United States District Courts have Jurisdiction over civil actions claiming a deprivation of rights secured by the Constitution of the United States or by Acts of Congress pro*603viding for equal rights or for the protection of civil rights, including the right to vote.1 The question presented by these cases is whether that jurisdiction encompasses a claim that a state welfare regulation is invalid because it conflicts with the Social Security Act. We conclude that it does not.
In the Social Security Amendments of 1967, Congress authorized partial federal funding of approved state programs…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- McNutt v. General Motors Acceptance Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1936
- Hagans v. LavineSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Haguer v. Committee for Industrial OrganizationSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
- King v. SmithSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Jones v. Alfred H. Mayer Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1968
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1,491 opinions
- Wilson v. GarciaSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Davis v. PassmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Gonzaga University v. DoeSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
- Jett v. Dallas Independent School DistrictSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Maine v. ThiboutotSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
1,486 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.