Legal Opinion
Herman v. Steadman
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided September 30, 1970No. 69 Civ. 2660PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
FREDERICK van PELT BRYAN, District Judge.
This action, charging violations of the Investment Company Act of 1940, the Federal Securities Acts and the Investment Advisers Act of 1940, is brought by a shareholder of one of three mutual funds against the management and ad-visors of such funds and others. Plaintiff alleges that the management defendants collectively manage and control three funds in only one of which plaintiff holds shares. The complaint charges in six counts that excessive and illegal brokerage commissions and advisory fees were paid by the funds, that there was improper…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Joseph B. KAUFFMAN Et Al. v. the DREYFUS FUND, INC., Et Al., Investors Diversified Services, Inc., Et Al., AppellantsCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1970
- DeHaas v. Empire Petroleum CompanyDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 1968
- Fleischer v. Paramount Pictures Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1964
- Henry v. General Motors CorporationDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 1964
- General Time Corporation v. American Investors Fund, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1968
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Weiner v. Bank of King of PrussiaDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1973
- Mann v. Kemper Financial Companies, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1992
- Werfel v. KramarskyDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 1974
- Schaffner v. Chemical BankDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1972
- Dandorph v. Fahnestock & Co.District Court, D. Connecticut · 1979
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.