Legal Opinion
Dandorph v. Fahnestock & Co.
District Court, D. Connecticut
Decided January 9, 1979No. Civ. B-77-231PublishedCited by 21 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ELLEN B. BURNS, District Judge.
RULING ON DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO DISMISS
Plaintiff, a resident” of Connecticut, brings this action against defendant, a registered broker dealer and investment advis- or with its principal place of business in New York. Plaintiff’s second amended compláint cites three counts, two based on the federal securities law and one based on pendent state jurisdiction, for the actions of defendant’s employee, Frank M. Iannotti. Count One alleges that through its employee defendant caused excessive trading and received excessive commissions with respect to plaintiff’s…
2Cases cited37 opinions
- United Mine Workers of America v. GibbsSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- International Union, United Automobile, Aerospace & Agricultural Implement Workers of America v. Hoosier Cardinal Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Esplin v. HirschiCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1968
- Bernard v. Beneficial Finance Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 94,437 Hetty Fey v. Walston & Co., Inc., and Robert A. SpiraCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1974
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- In Re Catanella and EF Hutton and Co.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1984
- Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 98,655 J. Scott Campbell v. The Upjohn CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1982
- Welch III v. Cadre CapitalCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1991
- In Re National Mortgage Equity Corp. Mortgage Pool Certificates Securities LitigationDistrict Court, C.D. California · 1986
- Klock v. Lehman Brothers Kuhn Loeb Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1984
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.