Legal Opinion

Joseph B. KAUFFMAN Et Al. v. the DREYFUS FUND, INC., Et Al., Investors Diversified Services, Inc., Et Al., Appellants

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided October 20, 1970No. 18568-18696PublishedCited by 261 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

ALDISERT, Circuit Judge.

Before us for review is an interlocutory order of the district court duly certified for appeal under the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 1292(b) denying appellants’ motions to dismiss the action in its entirety or, alternatively, to dismiss certain individual, representative, and derivative claims.

Plaintiff-appellee, a shareholder of four mutual funds, 1 filed a three-count action against 65 mutual funds, 38 investment advisers, 37 directors alleged to be serving contemporaneously as fund directors or trustees and investment advisers, and the Investment…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Cohen v. Beneficial Industrial Loan Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1949
  2. Ashwander v. Tennessee Valley AuthoritySupreme Court of the United States · 1936
  3. Hansberry v. LeeSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
  4. Hawes v. OaklandSupreme Court of the United States · 1882
  5. Smith v. SperlingSupreme Court of the United States · 1957

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by261 opinions

  1. Hawaii v. Standard Oil Co. of Cal.Supreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. Reuben J. Katz, on Behalf of Himself and All Others Similarly Situated v. Carte Blanche CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1974
  3. Krim M. Ballentine v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2007
  4. Haberman v. Washington Public Power Supply SystemWashington Supreme Court · 1988
  5. Winer Family Trust v. QueenCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2007

256 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API