Legal Opinion
Werfel v. Kramarsky
District Court, N.D. New York
Decided January 31, 1974No. 73 Civ. 2178-LFMPublishedCited by 38 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
MacMAHON, District Judge.
Plaintiff moves for an order, pursuant to Rule 23(c)(1), Fed.R.Civ.P., and Civil Rule 11A of this court, declaring that this action may be maintained as a class action. Defendants cross-move, under Rule 12(b)(6), Fed.R.Civ.P., for an order dismissing the first count of the complaint insofar as it asserts a claim under § 14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the Act), 15 U.S.C. § 78n, and dismissing the second count of the complaint, or, in the alternative, for partial summary judgment. We turn, first, to the dismissal motions.1
Plaintiff is a former…
2Cases cited33 opinions
- Ashwander v. Tennessee Valley AuthoritySupreme Court of the United States · 1936
- Affiliated Ute Citizens of Utah v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Mills v. Electric Auto-Lite Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
- J. I. Case Co. v. BorakSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Eisen v. Carlisle & JacquelinCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1968
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by38 opinions
- Blackie v. BarrackCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1975
- In Re the Cadillac V8-6-4 Class ActionSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2004
- Piel v. National Semiconductor Corp.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1980
- Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 95,408 Charles E. Williams v. James N. Sinclair, Dan R. Carlson and Frank Yazzolino v. James N. SinclairCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1976
- Greenspan v. BrasslerDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1978
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.