Legal Opinion
Weiner v. Bank of King of Prussia
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Decided April 30, 1973No. Civ. A. 72-1444PublishedCited by 118 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
NEWCOMER, District Judge.
Presently before the Court is a Motion to Dismiss the Amended Complaint in the above captioned action under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b) on the ground that the plaintiff lacks standing to maintain his action. The Motion has been submitted by all defendants except Central Penn National Bank.
The plaintiff has brought this action against twenty (20) named banks, including seven (7) national banks and thirteen (13) state banks, and against a class of defendants said to consist of all other national banks within the Court’s jurisdiction. The…
2Cases cited89 opinions
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Flast v. CohenSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Aetna Life Insurance v. HaworthSupreme Court of the United States · 1937
- Osborn v. Bank of United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1824
- Joint Anti-Fascist Refugee Committee v. McGrathSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
84 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by118 opinions
- Robert La Mar v. H & B Novelty & Loan Company, Ronald J. Kinsling v. Allegheny AirlinesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1973
- Washakie County School District Number One v. HerschlerWyoming Supreme Court · 1980
- Haas v. Pittsburgh National BankCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1975
- Miller v. Pacific Shore FundingDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2002
- In Re Currency Conversion Fee Antitrust LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2003
113 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.