Golej v. Varjabedian
Supreme Court of New Hampshire
1Opinion of the Court
Branch, J,
1. The defendant testified that while he was traversing a distance of 500 feet before the accident he was blinded by the lights of an approaching car, but that he still “maintained the same speed . .. And did nothing.” He was then asked the following question: “Did you realize that night, as you were going along, blinded at least 500 feet or more, that somebody might be walking along the side of the road?” To this question the defendant objected on the ground that “this isn’t a case of walking.” The court overruled this objection and subject to the defendant’s exception the question…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Bennett v. LaroseSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1926
- Hawkins v. McGeeSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1929
- St. Laurent v. Manchester Street RailwaySupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1915
- Morrell v. GobeilSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1929
- Clark v. ManchesterSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1887
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Humphreys v. AshSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1939
- Gagne v. New Haven Road Construction Co.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1934
- Thibeault v. BrownSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1942
- Halley v. BrownSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1942
- Dorrien v. SiroisSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1934
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.