Legal Opinion

Morrell v. Gobeil

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided October 1, 1929PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPeaslee, C. J.

Whether a verdict should be set aside as against the weight of the evidence “is a question of fact for the trial court which has been decided adversely to the defendants. But such a decision presents the question whether it could reasonably be made and may be set aside when it is apparent the trier of fact unwittingly fell into a plain mistake.” Ingerson v. Railway, 79 N. H. 154, 159.

The issue before the presiding justice was that stated in Bennett v. Larose, 82 N. H. 443, 448. “. . . whether the evidence in favor of the plaintiff is of such overwhelming weight that everyone must find in her…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Cook v. Danaher Lumber Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1910

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Murray v. Philadelphia Transportation Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1947
  2. Rawle v. McIlhennySupreme Court of Virginia · 1934
  3. Wisutskie v. MalouinSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1936
  4. Marcotte v. Timberlane/Hampstead School DistrictSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1999
  5. Niemi v. Boston & Maine RailroadSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1934

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API