Legal Opinion
Bennett v. Larose
Supreme Court of New Hampshire
Decided December 7, 1926PublishedCited by 36 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
A motion to set aside a verdict "because it was against law" raises no question of law which has not previously been saved by exception. Smith v. Company, 78 N.H. 152, 159; Head Dowst Co. v. Breeders' Club, 75 N.H. 449,450; Nadeau v. Sawyer, 73 N.H. 70, 72; Pitman v. Mauran, 69 N.H. 230. The charge is not reported, and no exceptions were taken prior to the verdict.
The exception to the denial of her motion to set aside the verdict on the ground that it is against all the evidence is predicated upon the premises (1) that there was conclusive evidence of the defendant's negligence and (2) that…
2Cases cited41 opinions
- Nawn v. Boston & Maine RailroadSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1914
- Barker v. Publishers' Paper Co.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1918
- Free v. BuckinghamSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1879
- St. Laurent v. Manchester Street RailwaySupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1915
- State v. WrenSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1914
36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by36 opinions
- Panas v. HarakisSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1987
- Wisutskie v. MalouinSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1936
- Kierstead v. Betley Chevrolet-Buick, Inc.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1978
- Amabello v. Colonial MotorsSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1977
- Johnston v. LynchSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1990
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.