Clark v. Manchester
Supreme Court of New Hampshire
1Opinion of the CourtBlodgett, J.
There is nothing in this case requiring other than brief consideration.
The motion for a nonsuit because there was no evidence of a highway existing at the time and place of the alleged injury is disproved by the reported facts (State v. Morse, 50 N. H. 9), and the motions to set aside the verdict as against the evidence, and because it was excessive, raise no questions of law. Fuller v. Bailey, 58 N. H. 71, 72; Daniels v. Lebanon, 58 N. H. 284, 286; Hovey v. Brown, 59 N. H. 114, 116 ; Merrill v. Perkins, 61 N. H. 262, 263; Little v. Upham, 64 N. H. 279.
Neither is there any place for the…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Commonwealth v. DohertyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1884
- Doyle v. Boston & Albany RailroadMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1888
3Cited by15 opinions
- DRD Pool Service, Inc. v. FreedCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2010
- Bennett v. LaroseSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1926
- Rohlfing v. Moses Akiona, Ltd.Hawaii Supreme Court · 1961
- Burns v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1922
- Caldwell v. YeatmanSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1940
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.