Legal Opinion

Dorrien v. Sirois

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided November 7, 1934PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMarble, J.

The defendant contends that his motions for a non-suit and directed verdict should have been granted because there is no evidence identifying him with the accident, because there is no evidence of his negligence, and because the plaintiff was guilty of contributory negligence as a matter of law.

The plaintiff was spending the week-end at the Gerardi house, so called, on Deer Neck road in Auburn. At the time of the accident he and Miss Margaret O’Toole were out walking. They had walked north along Deer Neck road about a quarter of a mile to the point where Rattle Snake road enters Deer Neck…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Bennett v. LaroseSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1926
  2. Burns v. CoteSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1933
  3. Carr v. OrrillSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1933
  4. Golej v. VarjabedianSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1933
  5. Nicholaides v. WallaceSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1934

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Bellacome v. BaileySupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1981
  2. Halley v. BrownSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1942
  3. Bellacome v. BaileySupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1981

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API