Sullivan & Brugnatelli Advertising Co. v. Century Capital Corp.
Court of Appeals of Arizona
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
MEYERSON, Presiding Judge.
Where a default judgment is entered against one of several defendants, is the judgment appealable in the absence of Rule 54(b) language? Because we answer this question in the negative, we must dismiss this appeal for lack of jurisdiction.
The facts are essentially undisputed. Plaintiff-appellant Sullivan & Brugnatelli Advertising Company, Inc. (Sullivan) filed suit to collect a debt against defendant-appellee Century Capital Corporation (Century) and co-defendant Zila Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (Zila). Zila is not a party to this appeal. Sullivan’s attorney granted…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Richas v. SUPERIOR COURT OF ARIZONA, ETC.Arizona Supreme Court · 1982
- Hirsch v. National Van Lines, Inc.Arizona Supreme Court · 1983
- Bateman v. McDonaldArizona Supreme Court · 1963
- United Imports & Exports, Inc. v. Superior CourtArizona Supreme Court · 1982
- Rueda v. GalvezArizona Supreme Court · 1963
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- M & M Auto Storage Pool, Inc. v. Chemical Waste Management, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1990
- Master Financial, Inc. v. WoodburnCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2004
- Ruffino v. LokoskyCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2018
- Lee v. Sage Creek Refining Co., Inc.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1994
- Sanders v. CobbleArizona Supreme Court · 1987