Legal Opinion

Richas v. SUPERIOR COURT OF ARIZONA, ETC.

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided September 28, 1982No. 15890-SAPublishedCited by 53 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FELDMAN, Justice.

Petitioner brings this special action proceeding to challenge the trial court’s order vacating an entry of default against the real party in interest, Motorola. We accepted jurisdiction pursuant to Rule 8, Rules of Procedure for Special Actions, 17A A.R.S., and Arizona Constitution art. 6, § 5.

JURISDICTION

An order vacating entry of default is not appealable; therefore, review by special action proceedings is appropriate. Shemaitis v. Superior Court, 114 Ariz. 288, 288, 560 P.2d 806, 806 (1976).

FACTS

On May 23, 1980, petitioner filed a complaint in the Superior Court of…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Coconino Pulp and Paper Company v. MarvinArizona Supreme Court · 1957
  2. Marquez v. Rapid Harvest Co.Arizona Supreme Court · 1965
  3. Camacho v. GardnerArizona Supreme Court · 1969
  4. Schering Corporation v. CotlowArizona Supreme Court · 1963
  5. Rogers v. TapoArizona Supreme Court · 1951

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by53 opinions

  1. Daou v. HarrisArizona Supreme Court · 1984
  2. Brown v. Superior Court in & for Maricopa Cy.Arizona Supreme Court · 1983
  3. Webb v. EricksonArizona Supreme Court · 1982
  4. Hirsch v. National Van Lines, Inc.Arizona Supreme Court · 1983
  5. Christy A. v. Arizona Department of Economic SecurityCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2007

48 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API