Legal Opinion

Master Financial, Inc. v. Woodburn

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided June 7, 2004No. 1 CA-SA 04-0052PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GARBARINO, Judge.

¶ 1 We hold that a plaintiff pursuing a money judgment against a defendant whose residence is unknown but whose last known residence was within the state, or who has avoided service, can serve the defendant by publication in accordance with the requirements of Rule 4.1(n) of the Arizona Rules of Civil Procedure.

¶ 2 Petitioner Master Financial, Inc. (MFI) seeks special action relief from the denial of its motion for default judgment. 1 MFI argues that the trial court erred by concluding that money judgments were not available in cases where service was effectuated by…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
  2. Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
  3. City of Phoenix v. GeylerArizona Supreme Court · 1985
  4. Richas v. SUPERIOR COURT OF ARIZONA, ETC.Arizona Supreme Court · 1982
  5. State Ex Rel. Romley v. FieldsCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2001

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Blair v. BurgenerCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2010
  2. HTS, Inc. v. BoleyDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2013
  3. Roberts v. RobertCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2007
  4. Ruffino v. LokoskyCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2018
  5. Ritchie v. Salvatore Gatto Partners, L.P.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2010

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API