Legal Opinion

Hirsch v. National Van Lines, Inc.

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided May 12, 1983No. 16176-PRPublishedCited by 45 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GORDON, Vice Chief Justice:

Plaintiff Hirsch entered into an agreement to have his personal property moved from Chicago, Illinois to Tucson, Arizona by defendant National Van Lines (hereinafter referred to as National). When the property was received in Tucson, Hirsch found that several items were damaged and others were missing. Hirsch notified National of the problems with his property and ultimately filed a “statement of claim” with National. Although there were efforts at settling the claim, Hirsch eventually filed a complaint against National on May 14,1980. The defendant was served by…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Browder v. Director, Dept. of Corrections of Ill.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
  2. Adams Express Company v. CroningerSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
  3. Sandoval v. ChenowethArizona Supreme Court · 1967
  4. Coconino Pulp and Paper Company v. MarvinArizona Supreme Court · 1957
  5. Richas v. SUPERIOR COURT OF ARIZONA, ETC.Arizona Supreme Court · 1982

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by45 opinions

  1. Ruesga v. Kindred Nursing Centers West, L.L.C.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2007
  2. Bank of Ny v. DodevCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2018
  3. Ezell v. QuonCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2010
  4. Katz v. PierceUtah Supreme Court · 1986
  5. Barlage v. ValentineCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2005

40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API