Legal Opinion

Lee v. Sage Creek Refining Co., Inc.

Wyoming Supreme Court

Decided June 24, 1994No. 93-128PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CARDINE, Justice.

Gene and Georgine Lee (Lees) appeal from an entry of default and order denying their motion to set aside the default, claiming the district court abused its discretion. We conclude that an entry of default is not a final order and dismiss the appeal.

An appealable order is:(a) An order affecting a substantial right in an action, when such order, in effect, determines the action and prevents a judgment; or(b) An order affecting a substantial right made in a special proceeding; or(c) An order made upon a summary application in an action after judgment; or(d) An order, including…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Spitzer v. SpitzerWyoming Supreme Court · 1989
  2. Sevenprop Associates v. HarrisonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1988
  3. Tunis v. BarrowCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1986
  4. AETNA LIFE & CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY v. RowanNevada Supreme Court · 1991
  5. First-Citizens Bank & Trust Co. v. R & G Construction Co.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1974

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. First Southwestern Financial Services v. LairdWyoming Supreme Court · 1994
  2. Estate of McLean Ex Rel. Hall v. BensonWyoming Supreme Court · 2003
  3. Lee v. Sage Creek Refining Co.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1997
  4. First Southwestern Financial Services v. LairdWyoming Supreme Court · 1994

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API