Legal Opinion
Holley v. McDonald
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided November 23, 1966PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtKing, C. J.
The complaint alleges that on March 29, 1963, the defendants, acting in their capacity as the board of police commissioners of the city of Waterbury, hereinafter sometimes referred to as the board, after notice and hearing, dismissed the plaintiff from his position as a patrolman and notified him of their action. The plaintiff thereupon instituted an appeal to the Superior Court.
The appeal to the Superior Court, on a motion to erase, was dismissed for lack of jurisdiction of the subject matter. General Statutes § 52-7. No appeal was taken from that decision. See Riley v. Board of Police…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Olcott v. PendletonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1941
- Rathkopf v. PearsonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1961
- German v. GermanSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1936
- Willard v. Town of West HartfordSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1949
- Lampson Lumber Co. v. HoerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1952
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Adams v. RubinowSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1968
- Commissioner of Motor Vehicles v. DeMiloSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1995
- Meinket v. LevinsonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1984
- Jensen v. Nationwide Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1969
- Arcari v. DellaripaSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1973
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.